That’s a very young me(1) opening my first-ever Apple product, an Apple IIc.
The look on my face proves that the Apple-love goes way back. And that I was destined for nerdom.
- With hair!
We recently purchased five iPads for use in the library, which I’m quite proud of because I don’t honestly think it would have happened without my pushing for it and figuring out how we can circulate them to patrons. Probably because of this, it’s fallen to me to set these iPads up, train our staff on them, and prepare them for circulation.(1)
For a while I’ve been convinced that part of the reason for the wild popularity of Apple’s devices is because they’re so pretty, and it was easy, in the midst of all the soft angles and curves and lovely screens, to believe that I’m right on that one. Of course, I knew I was going to have to mar these Zen surfaces with barcodes. I was caught between wanting someone else to do it so I wouldn’t have to be the one to incur the Wrath of Jobs and wanting not to leave it up to philistines.
But when my boss asked me to write the name of our library on the backs of the iPads with indelible ink…I thought about just quitting right there. I tried to reason with her, that it wasn’t precisely necessary especially since we have Find my iPad activated on each of them. But it was a losing battle, and I knew it.
She also wanted to write on the front of the iPad, in one of the corners, on the glass but off the screen. I felt the big one coming on. I really did. People everywhere go on about the iPhone’s retina display, but personally I find the iPad’s screen much nicer to look at. So sullying that surface was so unimaginable to me that I deployed a strategy of bamboozlement. I tossed out the assertion that it wouldn’t work – the even indelible ink wouldn’t stay – and used worlds like oleophobic coating and ionic bonds and cations and electron exchange to support my claim. Which of course I have no idea if it was true or not. I finished up with that most flagrant – yet effective – of logical conclusion: “This isn’t regular glass. This is Gorilla Glass.“
Lame as that was, it worked. Whew.
But it still meant I had to write on the back of the iPad. I practiced on scrap paper with the verve of a jr. high girl with a wicked crush. I tried every variation I could imagine, letter-spacing, font-size, arrangement, until I settled upon what I thought would look best. I reminded myself of my tendency to over-embellish(2) and cautioned myself against it. Then I took a deep breath…
And put pen to iPad.
Or, really, more like right above iPad.
And I sat there like that so long I had to take a picture of how ridiculous I was being about this.
I just couldn’t do it. There has been less hesitation with really poor, life-affecting decisions than the arrest I was experiencing here. One time a buddy of mine asked if I wanted to try a rope to his back bumper and ski behind him as he drove down the icy streets in the (obviously) small town in which I grew up. That happened - including locating and tying the rope – in less time than this was taking.
I would think: ok…go! And nothing would happen. It was the inverse of so many cinematic comedic moments: rather than my hand doing things I don’t want it to do, it wasn’t doing something I was telling it to do.
And here I am again, honestly five minutes later…
I tried reminding myself that it’s just a device that it’s not alive that an object simply can’t possess beauty on this level. Because this was the same hesitation I experienced literally every time ever I’ve wanted to ask a girl out. I reminded myself that this is not the face that launched a thousand ships.
It wasn’t working.
So eventually I just closed my eyes and made a small dot on the back. The surface already marred by my hand, my only choice was to make the graffiti look as nice as possible. And I did. Slowly. And I thought, if nothing else, it’s at least a reminder that I did this: that I brought iPads to my people. Maybe it’s not quite on par with rescuing Jews from Egyptian slavery, but getting a state-funded university to pony up cash for this type of unnecessary purchase is at least as difficult as parting the Red Sea. And, unlike Moses, I didn’t have God on my side. Though maybe Jobs was.
Over the past week, I’ve spent a fair amount of my time making a little movie. No, I haven’t been cast in a Kevin Smith bio-pic. I made a little one-minute video for an entry into a wedding contest. Here’s hoping we win, but honestly even if we don’t I’m totally okay. I really enjoyed the process of making it, and I feel an amazing sense of satisfaction that I made something last week. Because life feels better when I make stuff.
I also realized that I have all the tools I need to be able to create the kinds of things I’ve always wanted to create. With my MacBook I can create songs and videos. I can work on writing wherever I am, thanks to iCloud and Pages.
And Scrivener, an amazing writing program, makes working on long pieces easier by giving me one place to keep all the little character- and setting-sketches, all the notes and errata, all the summaries and to-do’s. This has always been my biggest stumbling-block(1) when I work on a novel, losing track of these details. I’m looking forward to reassigning that memory space to something else. Like grocery lists and wedding-planning.
On the iPad I can create 3D models and electronic beats. I can Moog my heart out. I can layer loops like a dubstep master.(2) And the iPhone is capable of amazing photography and video.
And so since I have all these tools, and obviously since all these tools weren’t cheap, I have a new challenge for myself: to create something new every week this year.
Last week’s creation was the video, which due to the contest rules I can’t share with you at this point, but here’s a frame just for fun. This week…I don’t know. I’m working on a novel chapter, but since work will be crazy this week I don’t know how much I’ll get done. So it might just be a terrible line-drawing on the iPad or my first foray into the realm of vector graphics. But that counts.
A character in one of Tom Robbins’s novels says that the point of art is simply to create something that didn’t exist before.(3) That’s what I intend to do, at least once per week, and to think of it in those terms lest I set the bar too high for myself. The point is to create, not create perfection.
If you want to join me, let me know. I’d be happy to link to your creations, if you want to share them. I’ll update you on mine as each week passes. This should be fun!
No, not to the Dark Side…though that would be fun.
You’ve met Cooper:
You’ve met Amie:
Now meet Dave:
I have wanted a Mac for so long that this really is something of a momentous occasion. The recent Samsung ad pokes fun at creative people being somewhat snooty about needing Apple devices,(1) but here’s what I know: if you go to almost any store or website and enquire about recording music on a computer, almost everyone will tell you that you need to start by purchasing a Mac. I know this from personal experience.
And it’s not just a software thing. Everyone I know who’s tried to use a Windows machine to record – no matter which software they’ve used – has either devised wildly complex workarounds for basic audio-interface problems(2) or has simply given up.
I can’t speak for all creative people, but personally I haven’t wanted a Mac because I’m creative; I’ve wanted a Mac because they actually work, which frees my time to focus on creating.
I am no longer a PC. I am part of a happy Mac family.
Now I’m going to go make stuff. Or apply at a Starbucks.
The camera on the iPhone 4S is amazing.

Nothing has been done to this photo. No touch-ups of any kind. Just nature and a careful choice of what to shoot.
As if I needed another reason to fall more in love with Apple.
Yesterday was my last day as an Android user. I have given unabashedly in to what I can only term to be iLove, which I can only imagine will in time be followed by iEngagement and iWedding and iMarriage.
Though I’ll bet the stats for iDivorce aren’t nearly as high as the U.S. standard +/- 50%.
But I’ve gotten ahead of myself. Or, iDigress.
Back in June of 2007 I rocked a Motorola CRZR knock-off. It was…considerably less than sweet. All I used it for, though, was calling and this new thing I’d recently found called text messaging. I knew a few people who kept music on their phones, but these people were insane in my humble opinion. Forget that they could only keep around 100 songs and that the music players were about as cumbersome as a petrified club and that they sounded like a miniature diarrhetic sperm whale. Few things in my life had cemented my embrasure of technological advancement more than my 30GB Video iPod, purchased in 2005. It was slim. It was efficient. It was lovely. And it held all of my music. All of it. It’s hard to explain precisely how that affected me. It had something to do with liberation, that if I was walking home and I saw something that called a song to mind, I could listen to it. Right then. If a mood struck me at work, I didn’t have to limit its expression by which CDs I’d brought to work that day. It was incredibly freeing.
Why anyone would use anything less to listen to music was beyond me.
So when the iPhone debuted that month, I didn’t care that much. It wasn’t just that, to my mind, a phone and a music player different devices. What I felt for my iPod really was something like love. It had gotten me through a pretty rough patch in the very recent past and the thought of tossing it aside saddened me in exactly the same way that losing friends has saddened me.
But okay. So this is crazy talk, right? It’s a device. It’s just some wires and parts and a screen. This talk of fidelity doesn’t belong in this context.
Does it?
You can – and should – answer that for yourself. For my part, I’ll say that the Buddhist precepts that are the closest thing to religion I follow allow for the minuscule distinction I see between me and my iPod. In fact, we are made of the same substance, both of us being just light slowed way down. This is as true of the tree and the friend as it is of my iPod.
But again. That’s a question for you to answer. The above applies to me and isn’t meant in any way to be prescriptive.
A few years later, having gotten hip to the smartphone thing and poised with an available upgrade, I didn’t even think about getting an iPhone. The Black Bard was still doing what I asked him to do, was still the device I made sure I always had on me. And Android is a Google product. At that point, Google impacted my life on a daily basis in a much broader fashion than Apple. Yes, I listened to and iLoved my iPod, but I used Google for email, blogging, documents, chat…enough things that it made complete sense to try out an Android phone.
So I did. And I liked it. A lot. For a while.
Then, just like every Windows computer I’ve ever had, it started doing just random things from time to time. It stopped telling me when I had new text messages for a while. It started randomly logging me out of my Google accounts. There were other things, but what it all amounted to is a constant sense of me v. my device.
That line, that distinction between my and my Droid, widened.
And then I noticed that the Bard was slowly dying. It just wouldn’t hold a charge anymore for more than about a day, whether I listened to it or not. I was very sad, and out of lack of options more than anything else, I started using my Motorola Droid to listen to music. And I’ll admit it wasn’t long before I thought you know what? having one device for pretty much everything is really convenient. I began to forgive it for its transgressions, like the morning I woke to discover it had deleted all of my alarms. I began to think well…I am asking a lot of it….
That sense of me v. my device was still there, though, like a Facebook friend you can’t quite dump.
Now, though, I sometimes thought about getting an iPhone. For the first time I connected the years of more-or-less trouble-free interactions I’d had with my iPod with the troubles my Droid was giving me on a near-daily basis. For so long these two devices had such different purposes in my mind that I never compared them. Now I was…and it wasn’t favorable for Android.
But what killed my loyalty to Android was that Ashley wanted to go wedding-dress shopping. And that she’d bought an iPad just an hour earlier. I won’t go into why we bought one since it doesn’t matter here. What matters is that since I couldn’t be involved in shopping for her wedding dress – superstitions are as superstitions do – I asked her if I could use her new iPad to do some of my own homework. I went to Starbucks to steal some Wi-Fi and in three hours I managed to finish the articles I needed to read for class. And annotate them. And take notes. Three hours that would have been more-or-less wasted by wandering around shops while she tried on dresses at the bridal store were, instead, made into one of the most productive three hours I’ve ever experienced.
Thanks to the iPad.
From that moment forth I began to really pay attention to how well the iPad functions and how much I could do with it. I’d previously thought iPads to be completely extraneous – and they are. But that’s not the point here. The more I used the iPad the more I noticed the distinction between interfacing with a device and interacting with one. You and I can interface: we can have some type of exchange mediated by some type of distance or barrier. Or we can interact: remove the barrier.
It was then I realized that my love of the Black Bard was about more than just music.
My Android phone was nothing but a phone. Something I used. It never seemed as though it were sleeping; rather, if just seemed switched off. Disconnected. It was never a friend to me; I never named it. Whereas the iPad with is something I work with. That line between me and the device is as nil as can be. We can explore reasons for that another time, but I can sum it up this way:
The same gesture on an iDevice and an Android device – swiping the screen with a finger, one of the most basic and frequent things you’ll do with a touchscreen phone – yields small but distinctly different results. On an Android phone, as much as three seconds may pass before anything happens. On an iPhone, the screen moves. Right away. As though it were just napping while it waited for you.
Yesterday was my last day as an Android user.
Friends, I’d like you to meet my iPhone, Amie.
Ashley is not a fan of Apple products, so when she brought up to me on Friday the much ballyhooed statements Steve Jobs made w/r/t to Google and Android, she brought it up to make her point that Jobs was, well, kind of a dick.(1)
Believe it or not, she and I have actually gone a couple of rounds on the subject of Apple and, recently, of Jobs. Her hesitation with Apple’s products partially comes from an anti-populist perspective: everyone loves them, they’re all the rage, and she’s not going to buy into something just because that’s what everyone else is doing. I can appreciate that stance.(2)
But when it comes to Steve Jobs, she believes he was kind of a dick. I don’t entirely disagree.(3) Like I told her, I don’t think you get to be in that position of that kind of a company without being abrasive more than just occasionally. But I think the difference is that I’m a bit more willing to let certain things go. Context, as they say, is everything.
So let’s take some of Mr. Jobs’s statements w/r/t Android:
I’m going to destroy Android because it’s a stolen product. I’m willing to go to thermonuclear war over this.”
I recognize that Mr. Jobs is perhaps being a bit irrational in this statement. But I can appreciate someone who’s willing to go to any length – any – to stop a wrong.(4) Mr. Jobs perceives that Android/Google ripped off Apple’s iOS and, whether he’s right or wrong, he’s willing to challenge hell itself over this infraction. Many people these days are willing to stand up for what they think is right, but precious few are willing to stand against what they think is wrong.
This sort of extreme behavior and unfaltering conviction is something I can appreciate. Ashley’s stance is that his being willing to take down another company is evidence of him being a dick. Maybe, maybe not. But at least he’s willing to state and stick to his purpose.
The real problem here is that we wouldn’t have Apple if Jobs hadn’t ripped off Xerox. He visited the company back in 1982 and walked out with an idea for a graphic user interface. I’m not faulting the guy: he took something someone else was doing and simply did it better. That’s free enterprise. But to fault Android for (allegedly) doing the same is…well, a bit hypocritical.
Furthermore, the tech-world has piracy in its friggin’ DNA. I’m not really even a part of that world and I know enough to know that everything awesome that exists right now was at least partially built on something someone else saw or had a hand in:
For Mr. Jobs to go thermonuclear over tech-theft is, as I said, hypocritical. It’s ridiculous too in that, in its own way, the theft of ideas is what make the tech world spin. So yeah, that makes him kind of a dick…but not because he’s willing to destroy a company over it.
I will spend my last dying breath if I need to, and I will spend every penny of Apple’s $40 billion in the bank, to right this wrong.
Ah, but being willing to destroy his own company…that’s a different story.
Again, the lengths that he’s willing to go to are, to me, admirable. But that he’s willing to risk the livelihood of every Apple employee and their families – to say nothing of stockholders – it shows a certain unforgivable selfishness. Apple hasn’t belonged to just Steve Jobs in a long time. It’s not his to sacrifice.
While I am, generally speaking, a fan of things, of the inanimate objects that dominate and, in some cases, improve or heighten the quality of my life, I tend not to blog about these kinds of things all that much.
I know at least one blogger who once had an awesome and intensely personal blog and now simply writes about products, services, amusements and entertainments. I’d hate for this blog or any of my writing to simply become a slave to consumerism.
On the other hand, I know another blogger who sometimes writes about some favorite products in a product-review kind of way and does it in a way that seems just an extension of his blog.
I’m going to try for something more like that.
So without further ado:
This edition of Saturday Things is brought to you by the Apple iPad.
Now I’m certainly not the first person ever to talk about the iPad. I’m admittedly late in the game. But there’s something about the iPad that I’ve thought for a long time but never heard anyone else say. We’ll get to that in a bit.
Firstly, The iPad is not a computer. Dave put it very well last week, “It’s more an ‘appliance’ that becomes different electronic devices as opposed to a traditional computer.” In that sense, the iPad is actually quite practical. It’s a highly portable device that becomes a thousand other devices as you need it to. Or a million. It all depends on which apps you download and what your imagination holds.
Doesn’t this sound a bit familiar, though? Doesn’t this sound a bit like something else? Let’s see, what devices out there are
Personally, I own a Motorola Droid, running Android 2.2. From a practicality standpoint, it does everything the iPad does. And it has an added practical bonus: it’s a phone. It has an obvious and useful reason to own it. Despite all the other cool shit it does, it does one thing that no other device I own does. Yes, I could use Skype to call my friends. While I don’t know of any off the top of my head, I’m sure that there are plenty of VOIP sites that’ll let me use my computer’s speakers and microphone to make non-video calls as well.
But then, I don’t take it with me when I run to the store in case I need to call Ashley. And my computer doesn’t fit in my pocket.
Know what else doesn’t fit in my pocket? An iPad.
But my phone does. Quite comfortably, in fact.
But back to my original point: name one thing that the iPad does that some other device you already own (or could own for far less money) doesn’t already do. I’m not talking about the apps, but the iPad itself.
If you have a computer, there’s no practical answer to this question. If you don’t have a computer, you can’t use an iPad anyway. Because the first thing it’ll ask you to do once you get one is to plug it into a computer and sync it with iTunes.
This is why Dave’s statement is so accurate. It’s an appliance. It’s something you might own, instead of something you might need. It has no function unique to it.
The biggest argument I can make any real sense of is the screen-size. I’m sure that it’s easier to read e-books on an iPad as opposed to my Droid. But reading on my Droid isn’t exactly difficult. Both the Kindle app and Google’s eBooks app work very well. I can adjust their settings to my liking. Yes the font is somewhat small, but honestly isn’t not much smaller than the text in the books I read. The only reason reading on the iPad might be easier is simply that I’d need to swipe the screen to ‘turn the page’ less often than I do on my Droid.
And, really, that’s not worth $500. Minimum.
I’m not saying the iPad isn’t cool. In fact, since at least 2007, when the first iPhone debuted, and maybe since 2001, when the first iPod debuted, Apple has been marketing ‘cool’ in amounts at least equal to their marketing power behind the products themselves.
The marketing of the iPad, in my opinion, shifted that balance to about 75% cool, 25% iPad. It is certainly one cool device. Sleek. Slender. Sexy.
Cool as it is, though, it’s simply not a practical device. If it had a unique function I’d understand. But as I said earlier, there is nothing it does that some other device in my home doesn’t do.
So I will not be bothering with the iPad, thank you very much. It’s a sweet device indeed, but I need something to be practical more than I need it to be cool. Put a flux capacitor in the iPad and I’ll buy one straightaway, driving home at 88 MPH no less. But until Apple gives this ultra-cool device a soul of its own, I see no reason to dump that kind of cash on it.